RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01786
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed to Virginia Beach, VA.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She was recently married and no longer has family at her
previous HOR. Her drivers license is now from the state of
Virginia and her husbands HOR is also listed as Virginia.
In support of her request, the applicant provides a copy of her
drivers license.
The applicants complete submission, with attachment, is at
Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant contracted her initial enlistment in the Regular
Air Force on 17 May 2012. Her DD Form 4, Enlistment -
Reenlistment Document, reflects Asheville, NC as her HOR.
THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial. After a thorough review of the
applicant's military personnel record and other supporting
documentation, there appears to be no error or injustice
regarding her HOR. The DD Form 4 is the source document for
HOR. Joint Federal Travel Regulation Volume I, Appendix A1,
Part 1, states in part that a HOR is the place recorded as the
individuals home when commissioned, appointed, enlisted,
inducted, or ordered into a tour of active duty. Any correction
must be fully justified and the home, as corrected, must be the
members actual home upon entering the Service, and not a
different place selected for the member's convenience. The
applicant's DD Form 4, reflects Asheville, NC as her HOR.
The complete DPSIPE evaluation is at Exhibit C.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 20 June 2014, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was
forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within
30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this
office (Exhibit D).
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the
rationale expressed as the basis for our conclusion the
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find
no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR BC-2014-
01786 in Executive Session on 12 March 2015, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR BC-2014-
01786 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 16 April 2014, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicants Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIPE, dated 27 May 2014.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 June 2014.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00074
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He requested that his HOR and POE be changed after his last reenlistment on 13 Jan 96 because at that time, he was a legal resident of San Antonio, TX. According to item 7(a) of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, his POE at time of entry reflects Springfield, MA. According to item 7(b), his HOR at time of entry reflects Hartford, CT. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02975
A review of the applicants military personnel records failed to substantiate an error or injustice to warrant changing his HOR. The complete DPSIPE evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy Of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 23 Dec 14, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04037
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04037 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her home of record (HOR) be changed to reflect an address in Florida (FL). We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of this case; however, she has not provided sufficient evidence which would lead us to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03507
________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Had she not been married to an active duty service member prior to her enlistment, she would have resided in Kell, IL, with her parents. After a thorough review of the applicants records and supporting documentation, there appears to not be an error or injustice in determining the members HOR. Exhibit B. Enlistment/Reenlistment Documents and DD Form 1966.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02979
After a thorough review of the applicant's military personnel record and other supporting documentation, there appears to be no error or injustice regarding his HOR. Any correction must be fully justified and the home, as corrected, must be the members actual home upon entering the Service, and not a different place selected for the member's convenience. The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-02979 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 19...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02033
The applicants enlistment documents reflect her HOR as Triangle, Virginia. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicants HOR is listed throughout her military records as...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01600
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01600 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed from XXXXXXX, Virginia to XXXXXXX, Texas. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04018
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04018 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His home of record (HOR) be changed from Dunkirk, Maryland (MD) to Eagle River, Alaska (AK). The applicants contentions are duly noted; however, he has provided no evidence which would lead us to believe that his home of record was erroneously...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01311
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01311 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed to reflect New Orleans, LA. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial indicating...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03858
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial stating there appears to be no error or injustice regarding the applicants HOR. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and...